Tranexamic acid for everyone? Yes please.http://t.co/qPMY2FXY— Simon Carley (@EMManchester) October 5, 2012
A few months back there was a short twitter conversation between (if I remember rightly) @adamchesters, myself and @karimbrohi about the use tranexamic acid for patients in the prehospital setting. At that time the picture was not that clear really as the data from CRASH-2 had not been analysed in such a way that might allow us to decide if this is a treatment for all trauma patients, or just those with the more severe injuries.
So good news folks.
This week’s BMJ has a sub-analysis of the CRASH-2 trial that compares the efficacy of TXA at different levels of pre-treatment probability of death (a fair indicator of severity I think you would agree).
So what did they find?
Well, they have gone back over the original data (based on 13,273 trauma patients you may remember) and have divided the groups into the following pre-tx risk of death, and have then compared odds ratio of death with TXA therapy (lower odds ratio =TXA is better). I won’t reproduce all the data here as there is a lovely graph here to view. In brief though…
Overall OR = 0.71
Arguably yes, this is a subset of the original trial which contained over 20,000 patients (subset as only those administered within 3 hours). Odd that really. I wonder if it explains the very different death rates they found compared to those they predicted. Even in the predicted death rate >50% the actual death rates were 5% and 7% which seems very different indeed. I can’t figure that one out as yet so please if anyone else can….. Arguably it does not make that much of a difference to the main finding (that severity of injury does not predict benefit), but I remain intrigued.
Allow me to summarise – TXA saves lives regardless of your pre-test probability of death (in this subset of the original CRASH-2 cohort), and does not increase pro-thrombotic events. So, what does this mean for me? It pretty much means that in any patient who I suspect requires a significant blood transfusion I will be giving TXA. Now whether that can be transferred to a prehospital setting is still unknown, but the evidence is building that it’s probably a good idea, and in the absence of evidence we should perhaps just get on with it.
Before you go please don’t forget to…
- Subscribe to the blog (look top right for the link)
- Subscribe to our PODCAST on iTunes
- Follow us on twitter @stemlyns
- Like us on Facebook
- Find out more about the St.Emlyn’s team
13 thoughts on “JC: Tranexamic Acid for Everyone? – St.Emlyn’s”
Love it, low cost and effective
Maybe TXA for trauma should be applied like ASA for chest pain?
Pretty cheap, little down side, works better if given early
It seems practical for the ambos to do the initial slow push 1g en route if no other life saving moves are required
I think you’re right casey, particularly in areas with long prehospital times.
Wonder what Minh and cliff think?
I’m with Casey,
as time seems to be of essence and taking in regard that it shouldn’t delay unnecessarily transport times (i.e. start bolus en route) – whatever reason could there be not to use it as soon as possible? (Which means prehospital)
Same goes with infusion after initial dose…
Often sadly still it’s used late or not at all!
Are we going to give it to kids-they are jsut small adults after all?!
Yes of course. On the Virchester protocol it is 15mg/Kg as a bolus then 2mg/kg/hr until bleeding stops.
Pingback: JC: What's the target temperature for OOHCA cooling. St.Emlyn's - St Emlyns
Pingback: Tranexamic acid - does the evidence stack up? - St Emlyns
Pingback: Top 10 Trauma papers 2014-2015. St.Emlyn's
Pingback: Speak Up! Have your say on the NICE guidance for Major Trauma - St.Emlyn's
Pingback: Robocop gets the NICE 2016 major trauma treatment. St.Emlyn's - St.Emlyn's
Pingback: Ashley Liebig at Resuscitate NYC17. St.Emlyn's - St.Emlyn's
Pingback: Earlier TXA saves lives: a review by St.Emlyn's - St.Emlyn's